![980 Pro vs 970 Evo Plus x16 RAID 0 drives in Mac Pro 7,1 (980 Pro is faster at 8.9GB/s read (14%) & 7.7GB/s write (11%)) : r/macpro 980 Pro vs 970 Evo Plus x16 RAID 0 drives in Mac Pro 7,1 (980 Pro is faster at 8.9GB/s read (14%) & 7.7GB/s write (11%)) : r/macpro](https://preview.redd.it/ty00inf1n9w61.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=f9abad91ba2c3848c5006c36e1f55d7864bbe84b)
980 Pro vs 970 Evo Plus x16 RAID 0 drives in Mac Pro 7,1 (980 Pro is faster at 8.9GB/s read (14%) & 7.7GB/s write (11%)) : r/macpro
Benchmarks Of Btrfs RAID On Four Samsung 970 EVO NVMe SSDs (Linux 4.18 + MSI XPANDER-AERO) Review - Phoronix
![As requested: MP 7,1 Amorphous Disk Mark for Samsung 980 Pro vs 970 Evo Plus, each 4x M.2 SSDs as RAID-0 Sonnet PCIe x16 : r/macpro As requested: MP 7,1 Amorphous Disk Mark for Samsung 980 Pro vs 970 Evo Plus, each 4x M.2 SSDs as RAID-0 Sonnet PCIe x16 : r/macpro](https://preview.redd.it/00ktodq1jax61.png?width=561&format=png&auto=webp&s=cb719c8ff6c20eb4bc8dbdfe65700f5d8cb14dea)
As requested: MP 7,1 Amorphous Disk Mark for Samsung 980 Pro vs 970 Evo Plus, each 4x M.2 SSDs as RAID-0 Sonnet PCIe x16 : r/macpro
Benchmarks Of Btrfs RAID On Four Samsung 970 EVO NVMe SSDs (Linux 4.18 + MSI XPANDER-AERO) Review - Phoronix
![Don't underestimate the power of using RAID 0 as an L2 Cache for your primary drive | by #hope | Medium Don't underestimate the power of using RAID 0 as an L2 Cache for your primary drive | by #hope | Medium](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1400/1*TmK4293uyrI6_J3uwMRXjQ.png)
Don't underestimate the power of using RAID 0 as an L2 Cache for your primary drive | by #hope | Medium
![Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB PCIe NVMe M.2 (2280) Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) (MZ-V7S500) : Amazon.in: Computers & Accessories Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB PCIe NVMe M.2 (2280) Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) (MZ-V7S500) : Amazon.in: Computers & Accessories](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71sVoMnX4KL._SL1500_.jpg)